Letters archive
Join the conversation in 91av's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
7 January 2026
From Paul Whiteley, Bittaford, Devon, UK
Wai Wong writes that painting roofs white is trivial in effect when it comes to reflecting the sun's energy back into space. While it is trivial, it is not nothing and is easy to accomplish. Winning strategies in sports are about accumulating small margins and improvements ( Letters, 27 December 2025 ). It is true …
7 January 2026
From Ian Smith, Chipping Norton, Oxfordshire, UK
Guy Cox isn't comparing apples with apples when it comes to the fuel efficiency of his diesel SUV. Diesel engines are inherently more thermodynamically efficient than petrol engines because the compression ratio is much higher, plus his old, original Minis would have used inefficient carburettors rather than modern fuel injection. Thus it's hardly surprising that …
14 January 2026
From Dyane Silvester, Arnside, Cumbria, UK
Your article "Lichens unleashed" paints a picture of lichens as complex symbiotic communities with the ability to survive in space and thus potentially undertake interplanetary travel ( 27 December, p 38 ). Has anyone considered they could, in fact, be intelligent and highly developed aliens – albeit on a microscopic scale – living peacefully on …
14 January 2026
From Dave Holtum, Bath, UK
Tim Rafferty's claim that simulators would only have to "simulate our ability to observe the universe" is often called lazy evaluation, but it faces a number of hurdles ( Letters, 3 January ). Objects cannot simply "pop" into existence: their current state requires a massive, recursive calculation of their entire history, effectively forcing a full-scale …
14 January 2026
From Mike Glennon, Hastings, East Sussex, UK
I enjoyed Tim Rafferty's letter about simulation time. However, many simulations run to an end to see a result and then decisions are made based on that result, so it would make sense to run the simulation as fast as possible. This raises the question: do those of us in the simulation experience time at …
14 January 2026
From Eric Cole, Dollar, Clackmannanshire, UK
If we are indeed living in a simulation run by a "superior" being, one thought consoles me: they will themselves be having doubts regarding their own existence.
14 January 2026
From Peter Slessenger, Reading, Berkshire, UK
Your article "Satellites to provide sunshine on demand" reminded me of a similar proposal reported by 91av in 1998. You kindly printed my letter at that time pointing out that many species of animal use the moon to determine the time to moult or spawn, or use it as a navigation aid when migrating, …
14 January 2026
From Jon and Christopher Fanning, Wilberfoss, East Riding of Yorkshire, UK
I feel compelled to point out the error in David Longhurst's simplification of Schrödinger's cat. The box that the cat is sealed in contains a vial of poison gas that will be broken by the decay of the single radioactive atom in the box, whereupon the cat will be killed instantly. As there is only …
14 January 2026
From Claire Berrell, Hervey Bay, Australia
Sam Wong's "A ticklish question" states that "it is impossible to tickle yourself". But I disagree – under one specific circumstance. When sleeping, if I don't keep my twitchy fingers away from my torso, I will wake myself up with that "being tickled by someone else" feeling. I wonder if anyone else experiences this?