91av

Letter: Two views on the naming of female body parts (1)

Published 2 July 2025

From Sam Edge, Ringwood, Hampshire, UK

I agree with Adam Taor that some of the terminology used for female anatomy, especially reproductive parts, is extremely paternalistic, if not outright misogynistic, and could do with revision(14 June, p 21).

I remember a discussion on the subject involving Germaine Greer, who recalled that once she had found out “vagina” comes from the Latin for “scabbard”, she began to prefer the earthy, four-letter C-word, as it has a more interesting and less demeaning derivation from Old Norse or possibly Latin. Of course, given the less-than-positive uses to which the C-word is now put, making its anatomical use mainstream might be difficult.

Issue no. 3550 published 5 July 2025

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with 91av events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop