A REPORT released this week casts doubt on the idea of “clean coal”. The
report, written by Sydney-based independent energy consultant Mark Ellis, also
criticises the large allocation of Australian government funds to coal
projects—about $80 million per year, it estimates. Ellis was
commissioned to write the report, called Can coal be clean?, by the community
group Aidwatch. It argues that improved technologies for burning coal might
actually increase carbon dioxide emissions as well as being costly. Fluidised
bed combustion and advanced pulverised fuel technologies will increase carbon
emissions and costs, Ellis says. Some other approaches, such as using gas or
solar energy, would reduce emissions but increase costs. The only approach that
saves money as well as fuel is improving the efficiency of using energy. Ellis’
report is available from Aidwatch, PO Box 652 Woollahra 2025, NSW.
More from 91av
Explore the latest news, articles and features

Mind
What to read this week: The 21st Century Brain by Hannah Critchlow
Culture

Health
Long covid reveals the harm of one-size-fits-all medical treatment
Leader

Space
Ann Leckie continues to shine with new sci-fi novel Radiant Star
Culture

Comment
Is an AI version of Mark Zuckerberg – or any boss – a good plan?
Regulars
Popular articles
Trending 91av articles
1
Weird 'transdimensional' state of matter is neither 2D nor 3D
2
100-year-old assumption about the universe may soon be overturned
3
Is consciousness more fundamental to reality than quantum physics?
4
Simple treatment tweak drastically reduces blood loss from severe cuts
5
Thought-provoking photographs capture what it feels like to have ADHD
6
We may finally have a cure for many different autoimmune conditions
7
The bombshell results that demand a new theory of the universe
8
Largest-ever octopus was great white shark of invertebrate predators
9
Why dinosaurs lived much more complex lives than we thought
10
Why the keto diet could be a revolutionary way to treat mental illness