In Science as a Questioning Process (Institute of Physics, £20, ISBN 0
7503 0369 7), astrophysicist Nigel Sanitt puts forward a stiff new test for
scientific theories: stated simply, any theory worth the name has to answer more
questions than it raises. Using a process he calls zetetic analysis, he shows,
for instance, that Darwinism was not a proper theory, though Neo-Darwinism is.
For good measure, he crams in some reflections on the lack of certainty in
science and its close resemblance to literature.
More from 91av
Explore the latest news, articles and features

Mind
The relationship recession is even bigger for Gen Z than we thought
News

Technology
Killer robots are here – we must finally decide whether to accept them
Leader

Technology
Quantum computer quickly mines cryptocurrency while using less energy
News

Mind
How to sparkle in conversation with strangers
Comment
Popular articles
Trending 91av articles
1
Fully autonomous drones have killed human soldiers for the first time
2
The relationship recession is even bigger for Gen Z than we thought
3
El Niño has started and the weather could get weird
4
Surprising male G-spot found in most detailed study of the penis yet
5
Millions of fossil whale bones found in deep-ocean ‘necropolis’
6
How to harness your body clock for a longer, healthier life
7
Explore the mind-bending and paradoxical art of M C. Escher
8
Is geothermal energy on the cusp of a worldwide renaissance?
9
How ageing on Earth mimics the effects of space travel
10
Global map reveals the vast scale of underground fungal networks