91av

What’s inside nothing? This laser will rip it up to find out

Far from being empty, the vacuum of space could be brimming with mysterious virtual particles. We now have a machine powerful enough to tear it apart and see

Laser_Cov

IMAGINE a place far from here, deep in the emptiness of space. This point is light years from Earth, vastly distant from any nebula, star or lonely atom. We have many words for what you would find in such a place: a void, a vacuum, a lacuna. In fact, this nothingness is a sea of activity.

According to quantum theory, empty space is filled with virtual particles. They are always there, keeping reality ticking over smoothly. They are also completely undetectable – unless, that is, you have an incredibly powerful searchlight. “Usually when people talk about a vacuum, they mean something that’s empty,” says theorist at the Chalmers University of Technology in Gothenburg, Sweden. “But a laser can show you the vacuum’s secrets.”

To expose virtual particles, to transform them into something tangible, takes one serious laser. But that is exactly what physicists are putting the finishing touches to in Romania. Switched on for the first time a few months ago, this machine could not only reveal the truth about empty space, but also teach us about another big mystery: dark energy, the unknown entity accelerating the expansion of the cosmos. It is time to rip nothingness apart and see what is inside.

The notion that nothingness is full of virtual particles might sound fanciful. After all, no astronaut swims in a virtual sea, no satellite is hindered by virtual drag. Virtual particles just aren’t tangible. The reason we believe they exist goes back to the foundations of quantum electrodynamics (QED), the branch of quantum theory used to calculate what happens when photons, particles of light, interact with electrons.

When physicists developed QED in the 1930s, their calculations only worked properly if they took into account all ways in which the particles could approach and ricochet off each other, including routes that normal particles couldn’t take because they break the laws of physics. The travellers of these impossible routes can’t have been strictly real, then. There has been a lingering question over how to interpret things that are mathematically necessary, yet not entirely there, ever since (see “What is a virtual particle?“).

QED also left open an alluring possibility. If you had an electrical field strong enough, you could “break the vacuum” and make the virtual particles real. Virtual electrons always exist alongside their antimatter equivalent, virtual positrons, and the two usually annihilate on contact. But create a monumental electrical field and the virtual particles could escape one another and become particles proper, ones we could detect.

The energy threshold where this should happen is known as the Schwinger limit, named after the QED theorist and Nobel laureate Julian Schwinger, though actually predicted by others before him. At this limit, the vacuum’s defining property, its emptiness, is broken. “The vacuum ceases to be a void,” says theorist Sergei Bulanov, based in Dolní Breany in the Czech Republic.

“With enough energy, a vacuum ceases to be a void. Its emptiness is broken”

Getting to the Schwinger limit would require bombarding virtual particles with an incredible number of photons in order to transfer the requisite energy. How much energy would you need? It is equivalent to cramming a billion times the output of all the world’s power plants into a space not much bigger than an atom. Not a likely proposal, unless you can gradually store up energy and then emit it all in one enormous flash.

Which is where lasers come in. Inside them, a chain reaction produces many photons of the same frequency, before releasing them in a narrow beam that can be powerful enough to cut though steel. It took a while to get to that stage. The intensity of early lasers was limited while we struggled to find materials for their innards that didn’t waste away in such blinding conditions. Then in 1985, physicists Gérard Mourou and Donna Strickland, while at the University of Rochester in New York, came up with a turbo boost. They found a way of pre-stretching and thus pre-weakening a laser pulse. It could then be amplified without burning through the material inside the laser’s chamber before being compressed to its original form, intensifying the energy it had gained in the amplification stage. It was this that earned Mourou and Strickland the 2018 Nobel prize in physics.

Even then, however, Mourou was setting his sights on a more ambitious target. “The laser power was at gigawatts, then terawatts, and then even petawatts were a possibility,” he says. “So naturally we thought, could we actually break the vacuum?”

In 2005, Mourou began to conceive of a laser behemoth that could, by the sheer intensity of its light, generate electrical fields at the Schwinger limit. His idea became the , and within a few years, 40 laboratories from 13 European countries were on board, with a European Union-backed budget of more than €850 million. The project now spans three sites. These include the ELI Nuclear Physics facility near Bucharest, Romania, which houses two 10-petawatt lasers that, when working at peak strength, will be the most intense in the world. Tests are being performed at gradually higher intensities.

laser
ELI’s facilities house some of the most intense lasers in the world
LLNL

The lasers could do more than just break the vacuum. Transforming virtual particles into real ones may also tell us about dark energy, perhaps the biggest mystery in cosmology. We know something is driving the expansion of the universe faster and faster, but what? Some suspect that the mysterious factor could be the energy inherent in ever-present virtual particles.

man in boiler suit
At peak strength, the laser at ELI will be 1000 times stronger than the UK’s Gemini laser
CTK / Alamy Stock Photo

That probably isn’t the whole story – add up the energy of those particles and you would expect the universe to be expanding much faster. But probing virtual particles directly could shed light on the mystery.

ELI could also help us understand the fast, bright bursts of gamma rays and radio waves that astronomers keep seeing in the night sky. These sometimes explode with thousands of times more energy than the sun produces in a year. No one knows how these explosions happen, only that they probably involve the generation of plasmas made of electrons and positrons, which twist and gyrate violently, throwing off photons as they do so. ELI’s lasers could create a cloud of electron-positron plasma, letting us study the material that makes these cosmic flashes so bright.

The biggest prize would be finding out what lies beyond the limits of QED. In everyday conditions, the theory successfully predicts experimental outcomes involving electrons and photons to extreme levels of precision. A little beyond the Schwinger limit, however, the methodology breaks down, as the routes taken by virtual particles get more and more convoluted, until the calculations become meaningless. “What happens is an open question,” says Bulanov.

With all this potential, it is no surprise ELI’s experiments are hotly anticipated. Yet despite Mourou’s grand vision, none of the lasers will be able to reach the Schwinger limit on their own. Even a mooted fourth ELI laser facility with an intensity 10 times greater than any of the other three would be 10,000 times too dim. “Nothing being built currently gets there,” says Michael Donovan, manager of the Texas Petawatt Laser in Austin.

Fortunately, that doesn’t rule out any magic. For one thing, the Schwinger limit is thought to be less a cliff face than a steep ascent. In other words, there is a chance virtual particles could start transforming into real ones at lower laser intensities (see “diagram”).

The power of light

Fatal avalanche?

That would be quite a discovery, although there could be a sting in the tail. In 2010 Mourou, now at the École Polytechnique in Paris, and his colleagues worked out that these newly materialised pairs of virtual particles would spiral around the laser beam, flinging off photons that subsequently transform into more electron-positron pairs, until there is an electron-positron avalanche.

This might be welcome for astrophysicists wanting to study electron-positron plasmas, but the avalanche would mask the transformation of the original virtual particle pair. Worse, it would , preventing it from reaching the true Schwinger limit. “It might be one of those instances where we say, OK, we can’t reach this limit,” says Jonathan Wheeler, a collaborator of Mourou’s at the École Polytechnique. “But in not reaching it, we’ve learned something.”

Time to give up then? Not yet. Shortly after the publication of Mourou’s paper, Bulanov and his colleagues realised that the avalanche effect should only occur if the laser beam is circularly polarised, with its electrical field rotating in a corkscrew fashion as it travels along the beam. They calculated that, if the laser is instead linearly polarised, so the electrons and positrons zigzag along the beam, they generate far fewer photons, containing the avalanche. “In fact, we can reach the Schwinger limit,” says Bulanov.

“One outlandish idea to up laser intensity is a mirror flying at the speed of light”

He isn’t alone in his optimism. To get over that thousandfold deficit in ELI’s intensity, laser theorists have begun to get creative. One option is to cross two or more laser beams, to double, or more, the laser intensity at the intersection. This Ghostbusters-style approach sounds easy, but Wheeler and others believe the practical details quickly get complicated.

A better option might be something more outlandish: a mirror flying near the speed of light. If a laser beam reflects off such a mirror, its wavelength is compressed, allowing it to be focused on a smaller spot. The smaller the spot, the more intense the light. First proposed by Bulanov back in 2003, the concept couldn’t employ a regular bathroom mirror – the energy required to accelerate it would be unthinkable. But Bulanov says a mirror consisting of a wave in an electron plasma would reflect the light just as well.

Five years ago, Bulanov reported the first results of an . He now leads ELI’s High Field Initiative, which explores ways of maximising laser intensity. “I’m absolutely sure that my idea works,” says Bulanov. In the meantime, Wheeler and Mourou are probing similar concepts to break the Schwinger limit. “We will find a way,” says Mourou.

Some are boosting the intensity of lasers already, by other means, and seeing strange effects. In February 2018, an international group led by at Imperial College London directed a beam from the Gemini laser at the UK’s Central Laser Facility straight into an oncoming electron beam. Just as a car crashing into oncoming traffic makes a bigger bang than a car crashing into a wall, colliding the two beams boosted the intensity.

The UK's Gemini laser
The UK’s Gemini laser
Science & Technology Facilities Council

The team saw the electrons emitting photons, and . For this to happen, the electrons in the experiment had to absorb a barrage of photons in a complex process nearing the edge of QED’s descriptive powers. “It is physics on the way to the Schwinger limit,” says Mangles.

Meanwhile, other laser facilities with similar powers to ELI are in development, including the Exawatt Center for Extreme Light Studies in Russia, and the Station of Extreme Light in Shanghai. David Reis, a laser physicist at Stanford University in California, says the Shanghai facility is being built near another big laser, perhaps allowing one beam to be collided into the other. “That would really be spectacular,” he says.

The future is looking bright for laser physics. Mourou’s desire to see another surge in laser intensity has been boosted by the Nobel he shared with Strickland. Wheeler recalls hearing the laureate’s prediction for exceeding the Schwinger limit at a recent conference. “Mourou said it would be within five years, and I laughed nervously,” he says. “But let’s just say the next few years should be a very exciting time.”

What is a virtual particle?

Quantum electrodynamics (QED) can be used to calculate the probability that a photon or electron starting off at point A ends up at point B with astonishingly high precision. Doing so requires taking into account myriad possible particle routes, many of which don’t follow basic physical laws. Regular particles always abide by the law, so we call the rule-breakers virtual particles. But what actually are they?

One way of picturing all particles is as invisible ripples, or fields, in space. When these fields are strong and lively, they manifest as particles. These are what make up all the tangible stuff around us, from the air we breathe to the ground we walk on. But in a vacuum, fields peter out to almost nothing. Here, there are the faintest shimmers of fields – not quite proper particles, but still something.

Ethereal they may be, but QED wouldn’t work without these virtual particles. And there are hints of their existence in the Casimir effect, in which two mirrors brought to within nanometres of each other will suddenly begin to attract. One explanation is that virtual particles between the mirrors are squeezed out, and can no longer balance the pressure of virtual particles striking the outsides.

Picturing virtual particles is always going to be tricky, though. The most precise thing we can say is that there exists everywhere a quantum wave function, a mathematical description of space and time, says Sean Carroll at the California Institute of Technology. “It’s something our classical intuition isn’t always great at making sense of, so we reach for vivid metaphors to describe what’s going on.”

Article amended on 25 January 2019

We corrected the captions of the photos of laser installations.

Topics: Particle physics / Quantum science