91av

Can we keep tabs on stockpiles of nuclear fuel?

To keep fissile materials from falling into the wrong hands, governments need to turn to safer reactor fuels and smarter detection technology
Who has the uranium?
Who has the uranium?

COULD a terrorist build a nuclear bomb? Opinion is divided – but someone out there certainly wants to buy the ingredients. In March, police in the republic of Georgia stopped a gang trying to sell weapons-grade, highly enriched uranium (HEU) on the black market. It was the eighth such interception in Georgia since 2000.

Such tales helped persuade last week to pledge to lock up the world’s weapons-grade material by 2014. By current estimates, that’s 1600 tonnes of HEU and 500 tonnes of separated plutonium.

But how to do that? One thing is clear: barbed wire and armed guards won’t be enough. Safer reactor fuels and smarter detection technology will be needed, says of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

“Barbed wire and armed guards won’t be enough. Smarter detection technology will be needed”

The effort is overdue. It used to be assumed that only governments could use fissile materials to make a bomb, so international safeguards focus on what national nuclear agencies do with their stockpiles. “Keeping civilian stockpiles safe from criminals has been a poor cousin,” says , director of the Centre for Science and Security Studies at King’s College London.

One urgent task is to find cost-effective ways to convert HEU-burning reactors to a safer fuel, especially the world’s 130 often poorly guarded research reactors. In the meantime, technologies are available that could reveal tampering with fuels. The in Ispra, Italy, has developed a seal for HEU fuel rods with a pattern of flaws visible on ultrasound scans that cannot be removed without leaving telltale signs. The seals were installed last year in Romania and Pakistan.

If thieves steal spent fuel, they will need to get the plutonium out of it. Current methods for detecting illicit extraction of plutonium require samples to be taken nearby, which can be politically impossible. But extraction also releases the radioactive gas krypton-85, which can be carried away on the wind and picked up by distant sensors.

The project coordinated by Simon Hebel of the University of Hamburg, Germany, has developed ways to detect krypton-85 and track its source from several hundred kilometres away. It is testing this for the (IAEA).

If all else fails, stolen material could be detected en route to its target. The US had planned to install 1400 detectors in ports worldwide to pick up neutrons and gamma rays emitted by HEU and plutonium, but because the neutron detectors require helium-3, which is in short supply (see “Nuclear security push bleeding cryogenic science dry”), their number has been cut.

Gamma rays are more difficult than neutrons to detect reliably. Existing germanium-crystal detectors have a high false positive rate, and a clued-up smuggler would not find it hard to block the gamma rays altogether.

Muon detectors have been developed as a back-up, but they work very slowly. Tannenbaum says the liquid argon detectors now used by physicists to spot neutrinos could, in principle, be used to detect both gamma rays and neutrons, but there are no plans to implement this idea.

Funding is a big stumbling block. No money was pledged at last week’s summit, beyond what countries already contribute to the IAEA’s small research programme, Bowen says. The iGSE group’s funding runs out next month.

Topics: Nuclear technology / Weapons