91av

Saving sniffles

KIDS who get lots of runny noses early in life are less likely to develop
asthma and other allergies, say German researchers. Their findings support the
“hygiene hypothesis” that ultra-clean modern lifestyles are to blame for an
increase in allergies and autoimmune diseases.

Sabina Illi of the University Children’s Hospital in Munich and her
colleagues analysed data from a study of 1300 children born in 1990. Children
who had at least two mild virus infections before their first birthday were only
half as likely to be diagnosed with asthma when they were seven, compared with
children who had been ill once or not at all.

“We think repeated infections stimulate the immune system,” says Illi. “The
speculation is that if you have a lot of infections, you will have less
.”
(see 91av, 13 January, p 12).

But immunologist Graham Rook of University College London isn’t convinced
that the infections protect against asthma. He suggests there are other reasons
why children brought up in less hygienic surroundings may get more infections
but fewer allergies. “A certain lifestyle seems to be protective, but it’s
difficult to say what’s causing it.”

Once we discover what’s missing from a hygienic environment, we can try to
replace it, Rook says. He thinks, for example, that contact with the bacteria in
soil and water is essential for regulatory cells in our immune systems to
develop properly. “If you don’t have the right inputs at the right time, you
don’t have the regulatory systems which switch off inappropriate responses,” he
says. Rook and Illi both look forward to the day when “vaccines” containing
beneficial bugs will prime our immune systems.

“I think that parents make too big a fuss about hygiene,” says Illi. “Daily
contact with bacteria and viruses can be good for a child.” But Rook warns
parents to remember the risk of disease before sending their children outside
to roll in the mud. “They should just carry on as they are,” he says, “but
without getting totally obsessional.”

  • More at:
    British Medical Journal (vol 322, p 390)