MOST of us have a vision of “primeval” wild Africa as it was before Europeans
arrived: of bush teeming with wildebeest and elephants, lions and zebras. We’ve
seen it on TV in endless wildlife documentaries filmed in the continent’s many
national parks.
That vision is largely a myth. Pre-European Africa wasn’t like that. The
great parks are, in truth, as artificial as an English country garden—and
Africa’s gardener, the force that shaped today’s landscape, was a microbe. The
day it reached Africa, just over a century ago, the continent changed forever.
Before, sophisticated kingdoms thrived, boasting navies, art and music,
elaborate court etiquette and international trade. After, there was the
bush.
The transformation began with a small invasion. An Italian expeditionary
force was making one of its periodic forays into the Horn of Africa. The
soldiers didn’t get far, but the livestock that accompanied them carried a
vicious hitch-hiker—a cattle virus that causes a disease called
rinderpest. As it spread, it ripped apart cattle-rearing kingdoms across the
continent, opened the door to colonial invasion, and left behind a depopulated,
tsetse-ridden bush that Europeans mistakenly saw as a primeval landscape of wild
animals and primitive people. To this day, hardly anyone outside academia is
aware of the calamity, even though—as with the slave trade—it was
the Europeans who reaped the rewards.
Advertisement
The rinderpest virus is a close relative of measles and canine distemper.
Native to the steppes of central Asia, it periodically swept through Europe,
usually spreading with cattle being moved to feed armies during military
campaigns. The devastation matched that wreaked by its compatriot, Genghis Khan.
In Africa south of the Sahara, however, rinderpest was unknown, probably because
camels, the only animals to cross the desert, were not susceptible.
But in 1887, the “cattle plague” appeared suddenly in Eritrea at the site of
the Italian invasion. It spread through Tigre in Ethiopia in 1888 and then
followed ox trails south along the Rift Valley and west across Sahel herding
routes via Sudan and Chad into West Africa. It took just five years to reach the
Atlantic, and within a decade it had arrived in South Africa. “For pastoral
people, it was a devastating experience—the mortality rate in cattle was
upwards of 90 per cent,” wrote John Rowe, a historian from Northwestern
University in Evanston, Illinois, in a 1994 study of the great pandemic. One
Masai elder in East Africa later recalled that the corpses of cattle and people
were “so many and so close together that the vultures had forgotten how to
ڱ”.
The British colonial authorities in southern Africa tried to halt the passage
of the disease by erecting a 1500-kilometre barbed-wire fence and shooting
infected cattle. But by the end of 1897 “even the animals on Cecil Rhodes’s
estate near Cape Town were dying”, says writer and historian John Reader. By the
end of the century, most of the cattle in southern Africa had died, a toll
estimated at 5.5 million.
The pandemic has been called the greatest natural calamity ever to befall
Africa. No native animal had a trace of immunity to the disease. “Never before
in the memory of man, or by the voice of tradition, have the cattle died in such
vast numbers; never before has the wild game suffered…The enormous extent of
the devastation can hardly be exaggerated,” wrote Frederick Lugard, a British
army captain who travelled the caravan routes of northern Kenya in 1890 while
scouting for an invasion of East Africa. Rinderpest only targets cloven-hoofed
animals, but indirectly it devastated the human population, too. Herders had no
livestock. Farmers had no oxen to pull their ploughs or drive the waterwheels
that irrigated the fields. Hungry populations fell prey to native diseases such
as smallpox, cholera and typhoid, as well as new ones brought by Europeans. No
modern researcher has estimated how many people died overall, but contemporary
accounts from across the continent reveal the scale of the catastrophe.
“Everywhere the people I saw were gaunt and half-starved, and covered with
skin diseases,” wrote Lugard. “They had no crops of any sort to replace the milk
and meat which formed their natural diet.” In places, epidemics coincided with
drought. Between 1888 and 1892, roughly a third of the population of Ethiopia,
several million people, are thought to have perished from the combined effect of
rinderpest and drought.
John Ford, who once directed the East African Trypanosomiasis Research
Organisation at Tororo, Uganda, conducted a detailed study in the 1970s of the
impact of rinderpest on a region of central Africa west of Lake Victoria.
Records in two typical districts, Bukoba and Biharamulo, show the local cattle
population dropped from about 400 000 in 1891 to just 20 000 the following year.
The result was famine among the Hima in Karagwe and Ankole, the Tutsi in Rwanda
and Burundi, and the Soga of Uganda, who all lived almost entirely on a diet of
milk and blood. In south-west Africa, the Nama and Herero pastoralists were also
starving.
But perhaps worst hit were the Masai in Kenya. Their folklore still tells of
the enkidaaroto, the “destruction”, of 1891. Most of their cattle died,
along with the buffalo and wildebeest of the Serengeti. The Masai were plunged
into wars for the surviving cattle and reduced to begging for meat from passing
caravans. The Austrian explorer Oskar Baumann, who travelled through Tanzania in
1891, estimated that two-thirds of them died.
“Almost instantaneously, rinderpest swept away the wealth of tropical
Africa,” says Reader. “The pastoralist aristocrats were ruined. Where herds had
numbered tens of thousands, only a few dozen animals survived.” British botanist
Scott Elliot travelled near Lake Victoria three years after the rinderpest hit.
He reported that wars and cattle raids had “produced utter destruction of the
community…The country is completely uninhabited.” In northern Nigeria, the
cattle-herding Fulani “having lost all, or nearly all their cattle, became
demented”, wrote Ford. “Many are said to have done away with themselves. Some
roamed the bush calling imaginary cattle.” Much the same befell the Dinka and
Bari in Sudan and the Karamajong of Uganda. Many of these societies never
recovered their numbers, let alone their wealth and power.
Rinderpest served up the continent on a plate for Europe’s “scramble for
Africa” in the final years of the 19th century. In its wake, the Germans and
British secured control of Tanzania and Kenya with barely a fight. In southern
Africa, the Herero succumbed to German occupiers, and the hungry and destitute
Zulus migrated to the gold mines of Witwatersrand, helping to create the brutal
social divide between black and white from which apartheid sprang. Lugard noted
that rinderpest “in some respects has favoured our enterprise. Powerful and
warlike as the pastoral tribes are, their pride has been humbled and our
progress facilitated by this awful visitation. The advent of the white man had
not else been so peaceful.”
But the ramifications of the rinderpest epidemic did not stop there. The
cattle disease opened the way for the tsetse fly, which even today is second
only to AIDS as an obstacle to Africa’s development. The tsetse fly lives among
wild animals in lowland tropical bush. It carries trypanosomiasis, a disease
which is lethal to both cattle and humans, in whom it is called sleeping
sickness. Initially, the rinderpest epidemic was bad news for tsetse flies,
because it killed their hosts. But it soon created an environment in which the
flies returned with a vengeance.
Tsetse flies like lush, extensive vegetation where adults can deposit their
larvae. Before rinderpest arrived, the cattle on the plains kept the tsetse in
check by grazing the grass sward very close and preventing tree seedlings and
shrubs from growing more than a few centimetres high. But without cattle and
other grazing animals, the woody vegetation grows fast. “Within a season or two
the pasture is transformed into woody grassland and shady thornbush thickets,
creating ideal conditions for the spread of the tsetse fly,” says Reader.
After the rinderpest epidemic passed, wild animal populations rebounded much
faster than the cattle, providing an animal host for the tsetse once more. The
flies and the sleeping sickness they carried in turn kept humans and their
cattle from returning to graze down the bush that was springing up. In a
landscape suddenly highly conducive to the flies, tsetse spread fast.
Ecological revolution
In East Africa in particular, highland areas once free of tsetse and which
sustained large populations of herders quickly became tsetse-infested bush and
woodland, says Reader. In southern Africa, the tsetse, which largely disappeared
from the Zambezi and Limpopo valleys in the mid-1890s as rinderpest swept
through, revived from about 1904 and took over its former domain and more, says
Ford. From virtually nil it had grown to cover 5600 square kilometres of the two
valleys by 1913 and 47 000 square kilometres by 1930.
For people, the impact was horrendous. Sleeping sickness was unknown in East
Africa until the ecological disruption caused by the rinderpest epidemic. But
after its arrival in the early 20th century, it caused millions of deaths, which
led to large tracts of land being abandoned to wild animals and tsetse flies,
says Keith Sones, director of the Nairobi-based consultancy StockWatch. An
estimated four million people died in Uganda alone.
Rinderpest led an ecological revolution against people and cattle and in
favour of wildlife. Africa has never fully recovered. Probably half a million
people contract sleeping sickness each year, of whom some 100 000 die. The
tsetse fly remains a major obstacle to the economic development of whole
regions—often the best, most fertile lowlands that would otherwise make
ideal cattle country. These become virtual no-go areas for humans and cattle
alike, says John McDermott of the International Livestock Research Institute
(ILRI) in Nairobi, who has studied the disease in Uganda. Conservationists have
called sleeping sickness “the best game warden in Africa”.
As Europeans poured into Africa a century ago, this brushy, tsetse-ridden
landscape, newly emptied of people and cattle and teeming with wildlife instead,
became their archetype of “unspoilt” Africa. It is no accident that the idea of
turning over large areas of empty African savannah into game reserves, first for
hunting and later for conservation, took hold in conservationists’ minds around
this time. “They just assumed that the country they found packed with animals
and empty of people was the way that Africa had always been. They thought it
needed protecting, and set about making laws to keep the people out. Many of
those areas are now tsetse-infested game parks,” says Reader.
The decades that followed the rinderpest pandemic were the great years of the
hunting safaris to Africa. When Teddy Roosevelt celebrated his retirement as US
President in 1909 with a mass safari, his party shipped home more than 10 000
carcasses, most of them to the Smithsonian Institution. This orgy of hunting in
what Roosevelt called “the greatest of the world’s great hunting grounds” made a
profound impression on the following generations of scientists. Julian Huxley,
head of UNESCO and founder of the World Wildlife Fund (now the World Wide Fund
for Nature, the WWF) in the early 1960s, described the East African plains as “a
surviving sector of the rich natural world as it was before the rise of modern
”.
With this fiction came a faulty notion of African savannah ecology, says
Holly Dublin, chief conservation adviser for the WWF in Nairobi and author of a
study of the changing ecology of Kenya’s Masai Mara National Reserve. The
conventional ecological wisdom of the day was that all ecosystems marched
towards a “climax” vegetation. And, imagining that the bush they saw was the
natural pristine environment of the savannahs, conservationists concluded that
the bush was the “climax” vegetation of the region. So they set about trying to
preserve it.
In their ignorance, they created Africa’s great national parks: the Serengeti
and Masai Mara, Tsavo and Selous, Kafue, Okavango, Kruger and the rest, from
which they decreed that humans and their cattle had to be excluded at all costs.
“They did not realise that 30 or 40 years earlier it had been open grassland,”
says Dublin.
The German biologist Bernhard Grzimek, writer of the book Serengeti Shall
Not Die and director of the film of the same name, worked indefatigably to
keep the Masai out of the Serengeti. “A National Park must remain a piece of
primordial wilderness to be effective,” he wrote. “No men, not even native ones,
should live inside its borders. The Serengeti cannot support wild animals and
domestic cattle at the same time”. Likewise for Huxley, the Masai cattle were
“rapidly reducing large stretches of land to dusty semi-desert”.
Pastoral harmony
How wrong they were. It has become increasingly clear that the notion of
climax vegetation fails to explain the evolution of Africa’s savannahs. “It was
not until the mid-1980s,” says Dublin, “that we began to see that the natural
ecology of African savannahs was much more dynamic, involving massive changes in
the space of a decade or two, switching between woodland and grassland.” That
natural system involved wild animals, cattle and occasional interventions from
bush fires. “Pastoralists have herded their cattle in harmony with wildlife for
thousands of years,” says Robin Reid, systems ecologist at ILRI.
The end result was a shifting mosaic of habitats across the plains. The
rinderpest epidemic gave that system a severe kick, pushing it toward bush at
the expense of open grassland. By excluding cattle from large areas, colonial
ecologists and their successors sought to maintain that state.
Today in much of eastern and southern Africa, there are two ecosystems,
created and separated by people: areas where farmers and cattle herders reign
and the bush and tsetse are tamed, and areas where the West’s peculiar vision of
“wild” Africa holds sway, and the bush runs wild and tsetse flourishes. The
truth is that the real world before the arrival of colonists was more like the
former than the latter.
- Further reading: Africa: a biography of a continent
by John Reader (Hamish Hamilton, 1997) - Rinderpest in the Sudan 1888-1890 by John Rowe, Sudanic Africa,
vol 5, p 149 (1994).