Politics news, articles and features | 91av /topic/politics/ Science news and science articles from 91av Wed, 27 May 2026 16:05:23 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1 242057827 Political anger affects the body differently to other forms of anger /article/2527614-political-anger-affects-the-body-differently-to-other-forms-of-anger/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=politics&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Fri, 22 May 2026 13:00:13 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2527614
The intensity of politically induced anger and disgust may be what spurs people to protest
Ian Francis/Alamy

If the emotional rollercoaster of global politics feels overwhelming, the findings of a new study might help to explain why. Emotions evoked by political issues seem to be felt differently in the body than when the same emotions are experienced in everyday life. Understanding how and why this happens may offer clues to how we can stay calm while remaining informed and engaged citizens.

“Feeling more is probably a good thing for democracy,” says at Royal Holloway, University of London. “Feeling better is about first figuring out what you feel, and then the challenge is learning how to respond rather than react.”

Tsakiris and his colleagues asked nearly 1000 people to mark on a body-outline diagram where, and how intensely, they felt emotions including anger, disgust and hope. Then, they were asked to do the same, but while reading words associated with emotionally laden political issues, such as terrorism and crime.

Their responses were used to create a digital heat map, which covered where in the body each emotion was felt, how intensely, and whether the sensation was linked to feeling spurred into action or demotivated and detached.

Previous research suggests that many , and the patterns of activation or demotivation . Depression, for instance, almost universally shows widespread deactivation across the body, reflecting a lack of energy and motivation, while anger is felt as a high energy, activating sensation in the chest, head and arms.

The new study largely reflected these past findings, except when some emotions were evoked by politics. “People usually feel that their whole body is deactivated when they’re depressed, but politically linked depression is more mobilising”, says Tsakiris, with more intense sensations experienced throughout the torso and limbs.

Political disgust was also felt as a higher-energy sensation across the upper body, compared to non-political disgust which clusters around the gut. When compared with non-political emotions, “political disgust more closely resembles anger”, says Tsakiris.

Why this occurs isn’t clear, but Tsakiris speculates it might be because political issues feel too big to tackle on our own, so we might feel motivated to join a wider cause to effect change. “The sense of agency that we have in politics is quite different,” he says. “We cannot probably effect a change on our own. It will be a collective effort.”

By getting better acquainted with our emotions, we may be able to avoid getting trapped in a cycle of doom scrolling and despair, says at the Brighton and Sussex Medical School, UK. “We like to think of ourselves as rational beings, but that doesn’t consider how the body influences our decisions, behaviours and responses.”

Quadt and her colleagues have previously shown that training people to listen to their heartbeat and other bodily sensations associated with strong emotions . Getting more in tune with how we feel, “might indeed help to become less overwhelmed by negative emotions and perhaps then enable action, rather than avoidance”, she says.

Journal reference:

PNAS

]]>
2527614
We were wrong about being able to ‘nudge’ people to improve the world /article/2511930-we-were-wrong-about-being-able-to-nudge-people-to-improve-the-world/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=politics&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 21 Jan 2026 18:00:00 +0000 http://mg26935790.100 2511930 91av changed the UK’s freedom of information laws in 2025 /article/2504851-new-scientist-changed-the-uks-freedom-of-information-laws-in-2025/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=politics&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Mon, 22 Dec 2025 17:00:28 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2504851 2504851 Human minds abhor uncertainty. This is a problem for liberal democracy /article/2502758-human-minds-abhor-uncertainty-this-is-a-problem-for-liberal-democracy/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=politics&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 05 Nov 2025 18:00:00 +0000 http://mg26835682.500 2502758 Steven Pinker’s new book shows how he’s become a contradictory figure /article/2496275-steven-pinkers-new-book-shows-how-hes-become-a-contradictory-figure/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=politics&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 17 Sep 2025 18:00:00 +0000 http://mg26735610.200 2496275 Why Trump’s order targeting ‘woke’ AI may be impossible to follow /article/2489771-why-trumps-order-targeting-woke-ai-may-be-impossible-to-follow/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=politics&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Thu, 24 Jul 2025 19:00:04 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2489771 Donald Trump displays a signed executive order at an AI summit
US President Donald Trump displays a signed executive order at an AI summit on 23 July 2025 in Washington, DC
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
President Donald Trump wants to ensure the US government only gives federal contracts to artificial intelligence developers whose systems are “free from ideological bias”. But the new requirements could allow his administration to impose its own worldview on tech companies’ AI models – and companies may face significant challenges and risks in trying to modify their models to comply. “The suggestion that government contracts should be structured to ensure AI systems are ‘objective’ and ‘free from top-down ideological bias’ prompts the question: objective according to whom?” says at the Center for Democracy & Technology, a public policy non-profit in Washington DC. The Trump White House’s , released on 23 July, recommends updating federal guidelines “to ensure that the government only contracts with frontier large language model (LLM) developers who ensure that their systems are objective and free from top-down ideological bias”. Trump signed a related titled “Preventing Woke AI in the Federal Government” on the same day. The AI action plan also recommends the US National Institute of Standards and Technology revise its AI risk management framework to “eliminate references to misinformation, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and climate change”. The Trump administration has already defunded research studying misinformation and shut down DEI initiatives, along with dismissing researchers working on the US National Climate Assessment report and cutting clean energy spending in a bill backed by the Republican-dominated Congress. “AI systems cannot be considered ‘free from top-down bias’ if the government itself is imposing its worldview on developers and users of these systems,” says Branum. “These impossibly vague standards are ripe for abuse.” Now AI developers holding or seeking federal contracts face the prospect of having to comply with the Trump administration’s push for AI models free from “ideological bias”. Amazon, Google and Microsoft have held federal contracts supplying AI-powered and cloud computing services to various government agencies, whereas Meta has made its  available for use by US government agencies working on defence and national security applications.
In July 2025, the US Department of Defense’s Chief Digital and Artificial Office worth up to $200 million each to Anthropic, Google, OpenAI and Elon Musk’s xAI. The inclusion of xAI was notable given Musk’s recent role leading President Trump’s DOGE task force, which has fired thousands of government employees – not to mention xAI’s chatbot Grok recently making headlines for expressing racist and antisemitic views while describing itself as “MechaHitler”. None of the companies provided responses when contacted by 91av, but a few referred to their executives’ general statements praising Trump’s AI action plan. It could prove difficult in any case for tech companies to ensure their AI models always align with the Trump administration’s preferred worldview, says at Bocconi University in Italy. That is because large language models – the models powering popular AI chatbots such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT – have certain tendencies or biases instilled in them by the swathes of internet data they were originally trained on. Some popular AI chatbots from both US and Chinese developers demonstrate surprisingly similar views that align more with US liberal voter stances on many political issues – such as gender pay equality and transgender women’s participation in women’s sports – when used for writing assistance tasks, . It is unclear why this trend exists, but the team speculated it could be a consequence of training AI models to follow more general principles, such as incentivising truthfulness, fairness and kindness, rather than developers specifically aligning models with liberal stances. AI developers can still “steer the model to write very specific things about specific issues” by refining AI responses to certain user prompts, but that won’t comprehensively change a model’s default stance and implicit biases, says Röttger. This approach could also clash with general AI training goals, such as prioritising truthfulness, he says. US tech companies could also potentially alienate many of their customers worldwide if they try to align their commercial AI models with the Trump administration’s worldview. “I’m interested to see how this will pan out if the US now tries to impose a specific ideology on a model with a global userbase,” says Röttger. “I think that could get very messy.” AI models could attempt to if their developers share more information publicly about each model’s biases, or build a collection of “deliberately diverse models with differing ideological leanings”, says at the University of Washington. But “as of today, creating a truly politically neutral AI model may be impossible given the inherently subjective nature of neutrality and the many human choices needed to build these systems”, she says.]]>
2489771
Trump’s proposed science cuts will have huge consequences /article/2483474-trumps-proposed-science-cuts-will-have-huge-consequences/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=politics&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 11 Jun 2025 18:00:00 +0000 http://mg26635470.200 2483474 US stops endorsing covid-19 shots for kids – are other vaccines next? /article/2483164-us-stops-endorsing-covid-19-shots-for-kids-are-other-vaccines-next/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=politics&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Fri, 06 Jun 2025 15:09:24 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2483164 2483164 NASA is facing the biggest crisis in its history /article/2482958-nasa-is-facing-the-biggest-crisis-in-its-history/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=politics&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Tue, 03 Jun 2025 17:10:07 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2482958 2482958 How a study in the Stockholm subway could help prevent violent crime /article/2481564-how-a-study-in-the-stockholm-subway-could-help-prevent-violent-crime/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=politics&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 28 May 2025 18:00:00 +0000 http://mg26635450.100 2481564