Meltwater flushed frozen methane hydrates out of the sediment at the edge of the Greenland ice sheet after the last glacial maximum, which occurred 29,000 to 19,000 years ago, raising fears that melting glaciers could soon release huge amounts of this planet-warming gas.

Methane hydrates form when gas molecules are trapped in a cage of water molecules, freezing into an ice-like substance. They are sometimes called “fire ice” because they can despite being 85 per cent water.

They form under the high pressure and low temperature found in sediments beneath the ocean, permafrost or glaciers. Some suggest methane hydrates contain twice as much carbon as all coal, oil and conventional gas on Earth.

But global warming is disrupting some of the cold, pressurised conditions in which methane hydrates exist. For example, some scientists think a mysterious 50-metre-deep discovered in the Russian Arctic in 2014 was caused when permafrost thaw suddenly relieved the pressure on a methane hydrate. This would have released it in a “violent physical explosion”, wrote the authors of .

Now, researchers have found that flows of glacial meltwater in Greenland can also unleash methane hydrates. “We found a new way of releasing methane that we thought was in the bank,” says at the University of Manchester, UK, who led the research. “It is methane we thought was stable.”

Huuse and his colleagues knew methane hydrates were common in the spaces between grains of sediment at the bottom of Melville Bay in north-western Greenland. In seismic surveys done by oil and gas companies in 2011 and 2013, they noticed 50 large pockmarks in the seafloor, each up to 37 metres deep, clustered near a long berm of earth called a grounding zone wedge. During the last glacial maximum, this wedge was where the floating tongue of the ice sheet met the ocean bottom.

Free newsletter

Sign up to The Earth Edition

Sign up to newsletter

The researchers initially thought the pockmarks had been scoured by overturning icebergs. But when they drilled sediment cores in the area, they found the top layers of sediment were mostly free of methane, even though the temperature and pressure were perfect for methane hydrates.

They also found large volumes of fresh water in the sediments, rather than the seawater they expected. This could only have come from ice sheet melt. The team thinks that during the last glacial maximum, meltwater flowing under the glaciers in Melville Bay was forced through the grounding zone wedge, flushing out the methane hydrates.

In the future, meltwater could wash out hydrates at the edges of other glaciers as they retreat under climate change, says Huuse. Similar grounding zone wedges exist across the Arctic.

“In the not-so-distant past – could be 12,000, could be 15,000 years ago – a large amount of methane was released, and that same thing could happen tomorrow or in the next century, basically, of receding ice sheets,” he says. “And that’s bad news, because it’s not something we’d considered before.”

The research didn’t include an estimate of how much methane was released in Melville Bay, but Huuse figures it could have been on the order of 130 million tonnes. That’s the equivalent of about two years of from the US, although he notes this methane could have been released over the course of a century, rather than a year or two, and it was a one-time emission.

In addition, the methane would have been dissolved in seawater and, depending on the saturation, it may not all have been emitted to the atmosphere, he says.

The Antarctic ice sheet probably sits on top of even more methane hydrates than Greenland. The polar regions as a whole are to hold anywhere between 100 billion to 760 billion tonnes of methane in subglacial and marine hydrates. The release of even a fraction of that could rival the 48.7 million tonnes of methane currently released by the Arctic and boreal biomes each year – mostly from wetlands, lakes and streams – and speed up climate change.

Methane is already being unlocked from under the Greenland ice sheet. A published this month found meltwater streams across western Greenland are emitting an estimated 715 tonnes of methane per year. While some of this could be coming from hydrates, it is more likely to come from ancient plant carbon converted to methane gas by bacteria under the ice, says at the UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, who led the study. This will probably increase.

“If you’re getting enhanced melt, you’re potentially tapping into areas of subglacial system that… have got well-preserved organic carbon stocks that then have the potential to be converted into methane,” she says. “There is the potential of relatively large future release.”

A new variety of rice created by simple crossbreeding could reduce the crop’s emissions of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, by nearly three-quarters.

Rice growing is responsible for around 12 per cent of anthropogenic release of methane, a gas that has a warming effect 25 times stronger than that of carbon dioxide.

The emissions come from soil microbes in the flooded paddy fields where rice is grown. These organisms break down chemicals known as root exudates released by the plants, producing nutrients that the plants can use, but also making methane in the process.

To learn more about factors affecting the production of methane from rice roots, at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences and her colleagues grew two strains of rice in a laboratory: a Japanese cultivar called Nipponbare with average methane emissions and a genetically modified strain with low methane emissions called SUSIBA2.

SUSIBA2 produced less fumarate, a root exudate known to be a key driver of methane emissions, than Nipponbare. But when both strains were treated with oxantel, a chemical that inhibits the breakdown of fumarate by bacteria, the SUSIBA2 strain still produced less methane. This meant there must be another factor causing the difference between the varieties.

It turned out that the SUSIBA2 crop was secreting high levels of ethanol, which also seemed to be suppressing methane emissions.

Free newsletter

Sign up to The Earth Edition

Sign up to newsletter

The team then turned to traditional breeding techniques to produce a new rice strain by crossing a high-yield elite variety with the Heijing cultivar, a strain that produces low fumarate and high ethanol.

Over two years of field trials in China, the new strain produced crop yields of more than 8 tonnes per hectare, compared with the global average of just over 4 tonnes, and it emitted 70 per cent less methane than the elite variety it was bred from.

Five climate megaprojects that might just save the world

From solar power stations in space to stabilising melting glaciers, some researchers are proposing extremely ambitious and risky projects to fight climate change. Could they work?

at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia, says the study is an example of well-executed research into the culprits behind the crop’s greenhouse gas emissions.

“The core point of the study is they don’t use hard-core gene engineering or editing technologies or transgenic approaches,” says le Coutre. “They use traditional crossbreeding in order to create new rice lines which lower the synthesis of methane.”