Book review news, articles and features | 91av /topic/book-review/ Science news and science articles from 91av Thu, 09 Jul 2026 19:02:53 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1 242057827 This book is essential reading before watching the new Odyssey film /article/2531908-this-book-is-essential-reading-before-watching-the-new-odyssey-film/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=book-review&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 08 Jul 2026 17:00:33 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2531908 Jimmy Gonzales as Cepheus, Matt Damon as Odysseus and Himesh Patel as Eurylochus in Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey
Jimmy Gonzales as Cepheus, Matt Damon as Odysseus and Himesh Patel as Eurylochus in Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey
Melinda Sue Gordon / © Universal Studios

“You don’t acquire Homer; Homer acquires you.” So writes Adam Nicolson in , his paean to that indispensable pair of ancient epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey. Christopher Nolan’s of the latter makes Nicolson’s book essential reading now for anyone interested in the story’s greater significance.

Nicolson’s work follows three trains of thought. In the first, he waxes philosophical about what Homer – always referred to in the singular, but acknowledged to have been multiple people, spanning generations – has to say about the meaning of life and the clash between civilisation and depravity. He delves into the fascination literary giants have had with Homer, including John Keats, whose poem Endymion gives the book its title, and Alexander Pope, whose translations leave much to be desired.

The other two strands are more rooted in the tangible world. Nicolson digs into the text of the Iliad and the Odyssey and parses out variations in the Greek, tracing the language’s structure back to the Linear B of the Mycenaean era and beyond, and uses this linguistic examination to attempt to pin down exactly when the poems were first composed – much earlier than we’d previously thought, he argues. The standardised, written Homer that we know came down from a much older oral tradition, says Nicolson, as far back as even 2000-1800 BC.

The Mighty Dead: Why Homer matters by Adam Nicolson

Finally, he finds traces of Homer’s writing in archaeological treasures from around the ancient Mediterranean, from a papyrus found at the Hawara site in Egypt to a pottery shard discovered in a tomb on the island of Ischia, one of the oldest surviving examples of written Greek. The papyrus dates to about AD 150; the pottery, to the 8th century BC. Much attention is also paid to the shaft graves of Mycenae, and what they can tell us about the world before the Bronze Age collapse.

Nicolson isn’t interested in the historicity of the poems themselves – they are myths, after all – as much as he is in the world that produced them. He draws a compelling portrait of a complex ancient realm, and of people for whom these stories provided a link to their nomadic, warrior-centred past.

Rereading The Mighty Dead, with its focus on relics and remnants, reminded me of my honeymoon to Crete. My husband and I visited the archaeological museum in Heraklion and saw a boar-tusk helmet on display; in book 10 of the Iliad, you will find Odysseus described wearing one, too. It is a reminder, as Nicolson’s book impressively contends, that the world of Homer is still very much all around us, if we know where to look.

When you make a purchase via the links on this page, we receive a commission.

]]>
2531908
91av recommends a vital look at the science of fatherhood /article/2533006-new-scientist-recommends-a-vital-look-at-the-science-of-fatherhood/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=book-review&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 08 Jul 2026 18:00:00 +0000 http://mg27136031.400 2533006 Our verdict on The Selfish Gene: An unpopular piece of popular science /article/2531275-our-verdict-on-the-selfish-gene-an-unpopular-piece-of-popular-science/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=book-review&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 24 Jun 2026 17:00:09 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2531275
The 91av Book Club read The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins in June
ճ91av Book Club has been reading a popular-science classic in June: Richard Dawkins’s , which celebrates its 50th anniversary this year. I hadn’t previously read this one – it had always intimidated me (an English graduate). But my colleague Rowan Hooper, a behavioural ecologist as well as our podcast editor, reread it to see how it holds up today and concluded it pretty much did. He had a few issues with the biology and said it “feels its age” – Dawkins himself admits to “sexist pronouns” in a 1989 preface – but Rowan found that “the core message remains relevant not just because genes being selfish is a brilliant meme (a term Dawkins coins at the end of the book), but because it is such a powerful way to understand how evolution operates: the metaphor makes us think as if genes behave selfishly”. It was time to gird my loins and embark on a book I’ve always been a bit embarrassed for omitting. I have to admit to being a little exhausted at first: there was preface after preface in my edition, in which Dawkins was arguing with all sorts of people about how the book had been received. This was somewhat confusing, given I hadn’t – yet –  read it. I should have skipped straight to the first chapter. Once I got into it, though, I found myself (mostly) carried along swimmingly by Dawkins’s writing. He certainly has a knack for a good metaphor – I particularly liked the idea of our bodies as “survival machines” for genes. Without having studied any biology after the age of 16, I got my head around his central point: that natural selection works because genes, or copies of them (replicators, as he calls them), are out to survive, building the optimal bodies (or survival machines) in order to do so. I did find his tone a little irascible and hectoring at times. It was like he was having conversations with various colleagues/rivals about his points, rather than the general reader. For example, talking about how “one gene may be regarded as a unit that survives through a large number of successive individual bodies”, he writes that “it is an argument that some of my most respected colleagues obstinately refuse to agree with, so you must forgive me if I seem to labour it!”. We’re also firmly told about the correct pronunciation of “algae” (a hard “g”, people). There’s a lot of that sort of thing, but I finished feeling pleased to have got my head (mostly) around his argument. Book club members were less impressed – this is, I think, the book that has received the most negative comments of any we’ve read, with a handful of members deciding not to join us in reading it at all, as they disagreed with some of Dawkins’s personal views. (I share the perspective of member pwhipp, who wrote on our channel: “I don’t think we should reject serious scientific writing simply because the author is combative, controversial, or personally irritating. If we did that consistently, the shelves would become very thin indeed.”) Pwhipp, by the way, called The Selfish Gene “an important and very well-written book, whatever one thinks of Dawkins’ public persona or his outspoken atheism”.
Pwhipp was in the minority, however. Alan P was one re-reader who felt “underwhelmed” by The Selfish Gene. “The text is (as he admits himself but doesn’t change) sexist throughout. It’s not just the assumption of male pronouns for general statements, but there are some comments in the end notes and the text of the book itself that even for the eighties are questionable,” he wrote. “The tone is argumentative – sometimes I’m not clear that it isn’t argument for its own sake – but it’s definitely jarring. The endless footnotes contradicting the text are really difficult to follow. If the science has changed then the text of the book needs to change as well. So it may be that it was a masterly summary of the known science in its day – but now it’s a bad tempered, difficult to follow, mess.” Alan did enjoy the new chapter “Nice guys finish first”, added to later editions: “I was always of the opinion that genes don’t make ethics so it’s nice to have the idea that even if genetic determinism was a thing, that cooperation is a successful strategy in the wild.” Dee55, meanwhile, first read The Selfish Gene back in the early 80s and found it “an absolute revelation” at the time. Going back to it was “interesting”, but, as a humanities graduate, Dee55 found “specific challenges in following some of the arguments”. “I enjoyed the Chapter 5 stuff on the ESS (evolutionary stable strategy) as a fun ride, but I think I need to reread it before continuing. I am very aware that I am just not in a position to assess RD’s ideas in the context of other evolutionary biology thinking,” Dee55 wrote. Rowan took a deeper dive into the book in a longer piece for 91av, speaking to biologists about its message and what still stands today. Taking into account developments in the field that have happened over the past 50 years, Rowan wrote that “all the evolutionary biologists I spoke to for this piece struggled to find major problems with The Selfish Gene”. There was one exception: the idea of the meme, which, despite its memetic proliferation today, “doesn’t hold up”, he was told. Overall, then, a thorny choice: this particular piece of popular science was notedly unpopular for the 91av Book Club. When you make a purchase via the links on this page, we receive a commission.]]>
2531275
The 17 best popular science books of 2026 so far /article/2531302-the-17-best-popular-science-books-of-2026-so-far/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=book-review&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 24 Jun 2026 18:00:00 +0000 http://mg27036012.600 2531302 91av recommends an excellent look at the future of work /article/2530239-new-scientist-recommends-an-excellent-look-at-the-future-of-work/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=book-review&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 17 Jun 2026 18:00:00 +0000 http://mg27036000.200 2530239 91av recommends Togetherness, a radical new view of life /article/2528690-new-scientist-recommends-togetherness-a-radical-new-view-of-life/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=book-review&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Tue, 02 Jun 2026 11:30:29 +0000 /?post_type=article&p=2528690
The book jacket of Togetherness by Rowan Hooper
Togetherness by Rowan Hooper

Togetherness
Rowan Hooper
(, UK, out 4th June; , US, out 18th August)

The best books are those that give you a new perspective, but  by my colleague Rowan Hooper has given me something more than that – not just a new view, but a new way of seeing. In essence a book about symbiosis, Togetherness zooms from the inner workings of our cells all the way out to how our planet functions as a whole and back in again, revealing how biological cooperation underpins all life – and why Western science has largely failed to notice this for centuries.

Symbiosis is the kind of concept you learn at school, often with a too-neat-to-be-true definition and a few quirky illustrative examples – coral, say, or lichen. Both feature in Togetherness (plus plenty of extraordinary cases you won’t be familiar with), but Rowan makes it abundantly clear that symbiosis isn’t a freak occurrence confined to a few classic cases: it’s a rule of nature, occurring time and time again and everywhere you care to look.

Having demonstrated this, he then makes his passionate argument for how this revelation requires us to re-examine everything we know about the natural world. He traces our understanding of evolution through history, and how Charles Darwin’s dazzling fundamental insights on competition and survival have an overlooked counterpart in the tendency of unrelated living things to come together. Rowan – as big a fan of Darwin as I’ve ever met – treads the line carefully and shows how you can have both.

In the thrilling final third of the book, Rowan explores all the environmental ills of today, many of which are the result of us neglecting to consider how different species live and work together. He speaks to the scientists trying to figure out how, in turn, we could use symbiosis to right these wrongs.

I’ve worked closely with Rowan, 91av’s podcast editor, for over a decade, so I can’t pretend that this is an objective review of his third book. But listeners of our podcast The World, The Universe And Us will know that Rowan is someone who loves to dive into big ideas, and Togetherness manages to be both hugely ambitious in scope and also very enjoyable.

His plea for us all to adopt an ecological world view, one underpinned by the insights of symbiosis, is deeply rooted in his earlier career as a scientist, but Rowan’s many journalistic titbits – from what Karl Marx thought of Darwin to Carl Sagan’s opening chat-up line to Lynn Margulis – make it really fun.

Spirit of Antarctica expedition cruise

Join Rowan Hooper on a journey into one of the most remote and pristine environments on Earth guided by a team of seasoned experts, from naturalists to historians, who will share their knowledge of this extraordinary region.

]]>
2528690
What to read this week: Ripples on the Cosmic Ocean by Dagomar Degroot /article/2516488-what-to-read-this-week-ripples-on-the-cosmic-ocean-by-dagomar-degroot/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=book-review&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 25 Feb 2026 18:00:00 +0000 http://mg26935840.300 2516488 What to read this week: Bonded by Evolution by Paul Eastwick /article/2514648-what-to-read-this-week-bonded-by-evolution-by-paul-eastwick/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=book-review&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 11 Feb 2026 18:00:00 +0000 http://mg26935820.400 2514648 A new ‘brief history’ of the universe paints a wide picture /article/2513935-a-new-brief-history-of-the-universe-paints-a-wide-picture/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=book-review&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 04 Feb 2026 18:00:00 +0000 http://mg26935811.100 2513935 Can we battle the downsides of a rule-based world, asks a new book /article/2511933-can-we-battle-the-downsides-of-a-rule-based-world-asks-a-new-book/?utm_campaign=RSS|NSNS&utm_content=book-review&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=NSNS Wed, 21 Jan 2026 18:00:00 +0000 http://mg26935790.400 2511933